Emily Henderson

Re-thinking learning for the 21st Century

Emily Henderson

Representation, Belonging, and the Art of Advocacy

April 26th, 2026 · 3 Comments · Uncategorized

The Question That Started It All

When I first walked into a Cohort 21 session and was asked to articulate my “How Might We” question, I didn’t hesitate: “How might we maintain a diverse range of texts—both in authorship and themes—to ensure that students feel represented in their education, creating more safe, accepting, and empathic spaces to learn and grow?”

This question didn’t emerge from abstract idealism. It came from seven years of teaching experience, countless conversations with students who didn’t see themselves in the literature we assigned, and a deep conviction that curriculum choices are never neutral. They are statements about who we value, whose stories matter, and who belongs in our classrooms. After spending six confident years at my previous school, I moved to a new school this year—and suddenly felt like a first-year teacher again, uncertain about norms and unsure how to advocate for my values in an unfamiliar community. My HMW question became my anchor.

Where the Rubber Met the Road

The first real test came early. My co-teacher and I needed to finalize our Grade 10 curriculum, and I advocated strongly for keeping The Laramie Project—a play that explores the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard and asks students to grapple with LGBTQ+ representation, community responsibility, and justice. My co-teacher was hesitant. But I stood firm. I believed then—and I believe now—that this text does irreplaceable work in creating empathy and safety for our students.

Then something happened that made this abstract commitment deeply, heartbreakingly real. A student approached me privately and shared something deeply personal: they were navigating their own identity and transition, and they needed to know if this classroom was a safe place for them. They needed to know if I would be an ally.

In that moment, every decision I’d made about representation and curriculum choice crystallized into a single, clear purpose: this matters because students are watching, listening, and deciding whether they belong.

The Lessons I’ll Carry Forward

This year has taught me three things I won’t forget.

First, classrooms have significant long-term effects on students. We often get caught up in whether students master a particular skill or concept by June. But the real work of teaching is subtler and deeper: we shape whether students see themselves as worthy of being heard, whether they develop empathy for people different from themselves, whether they believe their identity is safe to explore. These effects ripple far beyond the academic year.

Second, advocacy matters—and it requires courage. It would have been easier to defer to my co-teacher’s concerns. It would have been easier to keep the curriculum comfortable and conventional. But I’ve learned that being a good educator sometimes means having difficult conversations and standing behind what you believe is best for students. Not stubbornly, but thoughtfully, with evidence and heart.

Third, representation creates belonging in ways that nothing else can. When students see characters who share their identity, their struggles, their joy—they are being told that their stories are worthy of literary attention. They are being included. And for some students, particularly those from marginalized communities, that inclusion is transformative.

Resources That Shaped My Thinking

My learning this year has been supported by powerful resources I’ve explored with my students:

  • Small Town Pride (CBC Gem documentary)—which offers nuanced storytelling about LGBTQ+ experiences in rural communities
  • YouTube videos exploring identity, belonging, and self-discovery
  • Research into Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) and how they create safe spaces in schools

These resources, combined with student conversations, have deepened my understanding of why representation isn’t a luxury—it’s essential.

The Big Takeaway

If I’m honest, this realization terrifies me a little: Teaching is about shaping who students become, not just what they know. We are in the business of human development. The books we choose, the conversations we facilitate, the identities we make visible or invisible—these are not peripheral details. They are the core of what we do.

And there is nothing—nothing—more important than the long-term impact we have on our students.

The Questions That Keep Me Up at Night

Even as I feel clearer about my values and commitments, I’m sitting with new questions:

  • What other texts have the transformative power of The Laramie Project? How do I build a curriculum that consistently offers representation across identity categories?
  • Will a more conservative school community be open to a Gender-Sexuality Alliance? How do I advocate for this kind of safe space in a climate where I’m still establishing myself?
  • How do I honor different viewpoints while holding firm to my conviction that representation and safety are non-negotiable?

These aren’t questions I expect to solve this year. But living in them—rather than dismissing them—feels like the honest work of a teacher committed to growth.

Cohort 21: Meeting Me Where I Was

I need to pause and acknowledge something: this journey would have felt much lonelier without Cohort 21.

Switching schools after six confident years was disorienting. Suddenly I was uncertain about what was normal, what was possible, what I could push for. I felt like I’d lost my expertise. But within Cohort 21, I found a community of educators in similar transitions—wrestling with similar questions, taking similar risks, supporting one another. The cohort didn’t tell me what to do. Instead, it met me where I was: uncertain but hopeful, new to this context but clear about my values. It gave me permission to ask, “How might we?” and to believe that the answer matters.

That sense of community, of being understood by people walking similar paths, has been invaluable.

Looking Forward

As I close this chapter of my Cohort 21 journey, I’m carrying a clearer sense of who I am as a teacher. I am someone who believes that curriculum is never neutral, that representation saves lives, and that advocacy for students is part of my job description. I am someone willing to have difficult conversations and to stand behind what I believe, even when I’m new and uncertain.

I don’t know yet if I’ll successfully establish a GSA at my school. I don’t know if my more conservative community will embrace all of the texts I hope to teach. But I know this: I will keep asking “How might we?” I will keep choosing literature that tells the stories of students who have been historically silenced. I will keep showing up for students who are figuring out who they are. And I will keep building the kind of classroom where every student—regardless of their identity, background, or story—knows they belong.

That’s the teacher I’m becoming. And Cohort 21 helped me see it.

Tags:

3 Comments so far ↓

  • Justin Medved

    @ehenderson

    Emily, this is such a powerful reflection. What stands out most is the way you have moved representation from a curriculum question into a question of student safety, identity, and belonging. Your post makes visible what is often invisible in teaching, that the texts we choose are not just vehicles for analysis, but signals to students about whose lives are worthy of attention, care, and complexity.

    I was especially struck by your line that curriculum choices are never neutral. That feels like the heart of the work. It also pushes your inquiry into an important next phase: how might you move from individual advocacy to a more sustainable architecture for representation? In other words, how do you build a curriculum map, department conversation, or shared text selection protocol that makes representation intentional rather than dependent on one courageous teacher in one classroom?

    One possible next step might be to create a simple “windows, mirrors, and sliding glass doors” audit of your Grade 10 texts, borrowing from Rudine Sims Bishop’s foundational work on why students need stories that reflect their own lives and open doors into the lives of others. Facing History & Ourselves also has strong LGBTQIA+ classroom resources, including lessons and reading lists that could help you build the broader ecosystem around a text like The Laramie Project. Learning for Justice has practical guides on LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum and responding to common concerns, which may be useful as you think about advocacy in a more conservative school context. GLSEN’s school climate research and resources on GSAs could also help ground your next steps in evidence, especially when making the case that inclusive spaces are not political extras, but protective conditions for student wellbeing.

    Your question about honouring different viewpoints while holding firm to safety as non-negotiable is the one I hope you keep exploring. There is such rich leadership work there. How do we create classrooms that are open to complexity without making students’ dignity debatable? That feels like the next edge of your action plan.

    Thank you for writing with such honesty, courage, and care. This is exactly the kind of reflective practice that reminds us that teaching is not simply about covering texts. It is about creating the conditions where students can become more fully themselves.

  • Melody Barclay

    Emily, I congratulate you on standing firm in your belief. Thank you for making the classroom a place where students feel like they belong. I am totally with you on students watching, listening, and deciding whether they belong!

    I recommend the text, “Educating Activist Allies” by Katy Swalwell. I’ve been reading this to further inform my lens around social justice education in the classroom, especially in our context, what the author deems “elite schools.”

  • Colin Darling

    Love, love, love this! As a student at HTS, we also read the Laramie Project in Grade 12 actually and it was attached to a project where, like the Tectonic Theater Project members, we were asked to collect interviews around a social justice issue in our local community and write and perform (as a group) a short little one act play in front of all the other Grade 12 English students.

    I also just think that, yes, we need to acknowledge how each cohort coming through the school is different, meeting kids where they’re at developmentally and especially at a maturity level is dangerous. I’ve also thought that the literature put in front of students should challenge not only their worldview, but their ability to empathize as well. Most independent schools will have quite a strong conservative base as you say, but fighting the good fight in instances like these will help build momentum towards a GSA – which will be another important step for Pickering for sure!

Leave a Comment