How Might We Help Students See Growth as the True Measure of Success?<\/p>\n
When I first encountered the question “How might we help students see growth as the true measure of success?” at the beginning of Cohort 21, I felt something shift. It wasn’t a question about pedagogy or curriculum design\u2014it was a question about what we actually believe about our students and what we’re willing to risk to act on that belief.<\/p>\n
For years, I’d watched students define themselves by grades. A 78% on a math test became their identity rather than a data point. A “B” in writing meant they weren’t “good writers.” The system had taught them to chase perfection, or worse, to stop trying altogether if perfection seemed out of reach. But I kept noticing something that grades couldn’t capture: students are more capable than grades show. They could think deeply, make connections, and solve problems when they felt safe enough to try.<\/p>\n
So I decided to test something. What if I created space for students to see their own growth? What if I gave them permission to think differently about what success actually means?<\/p>\n
We started small. We began tweaking our “Trail emails”\u2014short messages to students outside of formal assessment contexts. These weren’t about grades or evaluation. They were process-focused questions that invited students to reflect on their thinking, notice patterns in their learning, and see themselves as capable problem-solvers.<\/p>\n
The questions were simple but intentional. Instead of asking “Did you get the right answer?” I asked things like: “What strategy did you try first? How did you know to adjust? What will you do differently next time?” I was looking for evidence of thinking, not perfection.<\/p>\n
In one Trail email, I asked a student about her work on a budgeting project involving percentages. The assignment itself was standard\u2014calculate percentages for different spending categories. But in the Trail email, I asked her: “How might you use this kind of thinking in your own family’s life someday?”<\/p>\n
The response surprised me. She wrote about how she was already thinking about percentages when her parents discussed household budgets. She connected the math to real decisions about savings, emergencies, and priorities. She wasn’t just solving a problem for a grade\u2014she was seeing herself as someone who could understand financial decision-making. That’s growth that no percentage captures.<\/p>\n
Another student was working through our unit on Canada’s immigration policies. The curriculum asked students to analyze data and understand the system. But when I sent a Trail email asking him to think about how family size and government support intersected, something clicked for him.<\/p>\n
The student connected the policy analysis to his own family’s story. He began asking questions about why certain policies existed and how they affected real people. He wasn’t just learning about immigration\u2014he was developing the capacity to think critically about complex social systems and see himself as someone capable of understanding them. His growth wasn’t in getting more answers right; it was in developing agency as a thinker.<\/p>\n
Three core discoveries emerged from this work:<\/p>\n
Trail questions gave students permission to think differently. Many of them had internalized the message that school was about right answers and grades. When I asked process-focused questions that valued thinking over perfection, something in them relaxed. They began to take intellectual risks. They asked “what if” questions. They admitted confusion without shame. They weren’t waiting for capability\u2014they were waiting for permission to use it.<\/p>\n
The most striking realization: when you trust students and give permission to think beyond grades, they reveal capabilities grades can’t measure.<\/p>\n
Trust is the prerequisite. Students have to believe that you see them as capable, that you’re genuinely curious about their thinking, and that intellectual risk-taking won’t be punished. Trail emails communicated all three things simultaneously.<\/p>\n
I learned to notice growth in places the grading system never looks. Growth in asking better questions. Growth in connecting ideas across contexts. Growth in persistence when something is hard. Growth in seeing themselves as thinkers rather than grade-getters. These shifts don’t show up in a grade book, but they’re the foundation for everything else.<\/p>\n
If this resonates with you, here are the practical structures that made this work possible:<\/p>\n
These resources aren’t magic. They’re simply tools that create space for what’s already true: students are thinking, growing, and capable. The tools just make it visible.<\/p>\n
If I had to distill this entire reflection into one insight, it would be this: Teaching is about relevance, agency, and permission.<\/p>\n
Relevance: Students engage when they can see how their learning connects to their lives and questions that matter to them.<\/p>\n
Agency: Students become capable when they’re positioned as thinkers and decision-makers, not just grade-earners.<\/p>\n
Permission: Students reveal their full capacity when they have explicit permission to think differently, take intellectual risks, and define success beyond perfect scores.<\/p>\n
These three elements work together. Without relevance, permission feels hollow. Without agency, relevance stays superficial. Without permission, both remain theoretical. But when all three are present, something shifts. Students stop performing for grades and start thinking for themselves.<\/p>\n
This work has been deeply rewarding, but it’s also surfaced a tension I’m sitting with:<\/p>\n
How do I stay true to what I’ve learned about students’ real capacity when the system (and families) still measures success by grades?<\/p>\n
I believe in growth. I’ve seen what students can do when they’re trusted. But I also live in a world where transcripts matter, where college applications depend on GPAs, where families want to see evidence of progress in familiar metrics.<\/p>\n
I don’t have a clean answer yet. But I’m learning to hold both truths simultaneously: I can give students permission to think beyond grades while also helping them navigate a system that still uses grades. I can value growth while acknowledging that grades are currently the language the broader system speaks. The work is finding ways to make both visible and valued.<\/p>\n
Cohort 21’s central mission is to help educators explore how to foster 21st-century learning\u2014thinking that’s creative, collaborative, critical, and connected to real-world challenges. This reflection has convinced me that the foundation for all of that is surprisingly simple: students need to believe they’re capable, they need to see how their learning matters, and they need permission to think in ways that grades don’t measure.<\/p>\n
When I send a Trail email asking a student to reflect on their thinking or imagine how they’ll use what they’re learning, I’m not just assessing\u2014I’m communicating a belief. I’m saying: I think you’re capable of more than you know. I’m interested in how you think. Your growth matters more than your grade.<\/p>\n
That message, repeated consistently, changes students. Not because they suddenly become perfect. But because they stop waiting for permission to be the thinkers they already are.<\/p>\n
The question “How might we help students see growth as the true measure of success?” turned out not to be about inventing something new. It was about creating conditions for something that’s already true to become visible: students are capable, they’re thinking, they’re growing. Our job is to notice it, name it, and give them permission to trust it.<\/p>\n
Thank you to the Grade 6 team who engaged in this exploration with genuine curiosity. Thank you to students who trusted me with their thinking and taught me what they’re actually capable of. And thank you to Cohort 21 for asking the questions that matter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
How Might We Help Students See Growth as the True Measure of Success? When I first encountered the question “How might we help students see growth as the true measure of success?” at the beginning of Cohort 21, I felt something shift. It wasn’t a question about pedagogy or curriculum design\u2014it was a question about…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":386,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wds_primary_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,9,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-action-plan","category-face-2-face-sessions","category-how-might-we","category-session-four"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/386"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":112,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111\/revisions\/112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/michaelblack\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}