{"id":472,"date":"2019-02-17T23:46:09","date_gmt":"2019-02-17T23:46:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/larajensen\/?p=472"},"modified":"2019-02-17T23:54:57","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T23:54:57","slug":"why-transdisciplinarity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/larajensen\/2019\/02\/17\/why-transdisciplinarity\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Transdisciplinarity?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Just prior to the January Face 2 Face meeting for Cohort21 I revised my How Might We… question. I realized that, although I was interested in exploring teacher collaboration more deeply, I hadn’t been explicit about why.\u00a0In a short discussion with Adam Caplan<\/a>\u00a0it became obvious that the reason I feel so strongly about collaboration is because it makes it easier to teach in a transdisciplinary way.<\/p>\n Lisa Bellanger<\/a> helped me with the 5 Whys protocol with in which she asked me 5 questions beginning with “Why…” to get me to think more deeply.<\/p>\n I felt like I had clarified my thinking significantly until I connected and shared with\u00a0\u00a0Eric Daigle<\/a> and Lisa Mitchell.<\/a>.. They really pushed me to clarify why transdisciplinary learning and teaching is important. To that end, hI have been doing some thinking…<\/p>\n Consilience by E.O. Wilson, 1998<\/p><\/div>\n In his book Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge<\/a><\/em>, E. O. Wilson states that,<\/p>\n “The greatest enterprise of the mind has always been and always will be the attempted linkage of the sciences and humanities. The ongoing fragmentation of knowledge and resulting chaos in philosophy are not reflections of the real world but artifacts of scholarship”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n He cites consilience as,<\/p>\n ” a ‘jumping together’ of knowledge by the linking of facts and fact-based theory across disciplines to create a common groundwork of explanation.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Although he speaks more of the ability to reduce divergent fields to “a small number of fundamental natural laws”, when I first read this book 18 years ago I was struck by how what seemed like disparate fields converged around real-world issues. Thus, solving real-world issues may involve an understanding of multiple fields of research. For example, experts in the fields of environmental policy, ethics, social sciences and biology (among others) may all have something to offer by way of finding solutions to deforestation.<\/p>\n The Sorcerers and Their Apprentices by Frank Moss, 2011<\/p><\/div>\n More recently, I read The Sorcerers and Their Apprentices: How the Digital Magicians of the MIT Media Lab Are Creating the Innovative Technologies That Will Transform Our Lives<\/a> <\/em>by Frank Moss the former director of the MIT Media Lab. As stated on Amazon<\/a>,<\/p>\n “Moss reveals the highly unorthodox approach to creativity and invention that makes all this possible, explaining how the Media Lab cultivates an open and boundary-less environment where researchers from a broad array of disciplines \u2013 from musicians to neuroscientists to visual artists to computer engineers – have the freedom to follow their passions and take bold risks unthinkable elsewhere.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In one vignette he describes how a team with backgrounds in behavioural psychology, computer science and mathematical modelling won the DARPA Red Balloon Challenge despite only becoming aware of the challenge to locate 10 red balloons across the United States four days beforehand. Each member brought unique insight and skills to solving the problem.<\/p>\n Moss cites that it is,<\/p>\n “only by ignoring the existing artificially imposed barriers between disciplines can we ‘completely change the frame’ of the discussion and pose questions that no one has ever thought to ask before, including – maybe even especially – the so-called domain experts.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In a world grappling with multi-dimensional issues, breaking down the silos between disciplines allows us to consider solutions from multiple perspectives.<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a>
<\/a>