{"id":101,"date":"2018-02-03T19:25:15","date_gmt":"2018-02-03T19:25:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/?p=101"},"modified":"2018-02-04T14:25:11","modified_gmt":"2018-02-04T14:25:11","slug":"will-station-based-learning-increase-engagement-in-science-class","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/2018\/02\/03\/will-station-based-learning-increase-engagement-in-science-class\/","title":{"rendered":"Will &#8220;Station-Based Learning&#8221; increase engagement in science class?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>How Might We Improve Student Engagement in High School Science Classes?<\/h2>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the motivation for my action plan: most of my students are very social. They are also (for the most part) lower achievers than students I&#8217;ve taught in the past. So, I have many students who are more interested in talking than listening, and tend to get lower marks. It&#8217;s probably a &#8220;chicken-or-the-egg&#8221; situation. I decided to see if I could get them more interested in learning, and if that could carry over and possibly lead to higher marks. I tried two things in the last few weeks. Here&#8217;s what happened:<\/p>\n<h3>Self-Assessment<\/h3>\n<p>I gave each of my grade 10 science students (68 kids in 4 sections) a simple self-assessment. I told them it is the half-way point of the year, so let&#8217;s look back on your personal level of focus (code for &#8220;engagement&#8221;), homework completion, and marks. Then, let&#8217;s make 3 goals for the second half of the year &#8211; a mark goal, a behaviour goal (such as doing more homework, or not getting sent to the office again), and an organization goal (such as always bringing a pen, or completing assignments on time). Finally, I asked them to list 3 actions that they will do to reach these goals.<\/p>\n<p>My results were, predictably, interesting.<\/p>\n<p>While none of my students admitted to being &#8220;always distracted&#8221;, 39 students (57%) rated themselves as &#8220;usually focused&#8221;. Let&#8217;s just say if 57% of my students were usually focused, I wouldn&#8217;t need this survey in the first place. Good for the 8 kids (12%) who admitted to being &#8220;often distracted&#8221;. At least they&#8217;re honest.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/classroom-engagement.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-103 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/classroom-engagement-300x219.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"264\" height=\"193\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/classroom-engagement-300x219.png 300w, https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/classroom-engagement.png 360w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 960px) 75vw, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>A total of 36 students (53%) admit to doing little or no homework this year. I instituted a policy in September that I would be checking homework &#8211; not every day, but at each test. Students are to upload their homework to OneNote, where I will check it and give a completion mark. This is a mark that counts, but with a very low weighting. Let&#8217;s look on the positive side: 47% of students are doing most or all of the homework, which is a pretty significant number. If I did this survey in the past few years, 47% would probably be a high water mark.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/homework-completion.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-105 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/homework-completion-300x252.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"240\" height=\"202\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/homework-completion-300x252.png 300w, https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/homework-completion.png 338w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 960px) 75vw, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As for marks, a whopping 43 students (63%) rate themselves as &#8220;not bad&#8221; or &#8220;well below expectations&#8221;. Only 3 students are completely satisfied with their achievement based on their hard work so far. This seems like a fair and honest assessment. My students could definitely do a little better.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/mark-satisfaction.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-106 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/mark-satisfaction-300x234.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"259\" height=\"202\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/mark-satisfaction-300x234.png 300w, https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/mark-satisfaction.png 370w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 960px) 75vw, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Now for the especially interesting part. I took each student&#8217;s current mark and subtracted it from their Mark Goal. Not surprisingly, each goal was at least 1% higher than the student&#8217;s current average. Kids want higher marks. However, the difference between their goals and achievement so far was staggering! The\u00a0<em>average<\/em> difference was 11%. Students set lofty expectations as much as 40% over their current average. Only 25 students (37%) were within 6% of where they currently stand. I think this whole exercise only proves that our students lack the metacognition to properly self-assess their performance and abilities! That will be an action plan for another day.<\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Expectations-vs-Reality.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-104 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Expectations-vs-Reality-300x181.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"181\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Expectations-vs-Reality-300x181.png 300w, https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Expectations-vs-Reality-400x241.png 400w, https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Expectations-vs-Reality.png 478w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 960px) 75vw, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/h3>\n<p>Kids want better marks. That&#8217;s no surprise. The key is in the &#8220;Actions&#8221; &#8211; how will they go about attempting to achieve these higher marks? Will they take a hint from the first two questions and pay more attention, or do more homework? Or is it up to me to make the classroom a more engaging environment so that they forget about distractions and want to do homework? Let&#8217;s find out!<\/p>\n<h3>Learning Stations<\/h3>\n<p>Here&#8217;s something that I have been thinking about for a while and finally got down to doing, thanks to some good old fashioned Cohort Guilt\u2122. Plus, it fit perfectly with my chapter on Human Body Organ Systems. I broke my class up into four groups, strategically splitting up the chattiest and goofiest kids. During a class period, students rotated with their groups between four learning stations. Our periods range from 45 &#8211; 75 minutes, depending on the day, so each station lasted about 11 &#8211; 16 minutes. I encouraged students to take notes at each station, adding to one big note for the topic. Each day focused on one of the human body organ systems and I did this three times with each class (Digestive, Circulatory, and Respiratory systems).\u00a0I also said that if any time was leftover during a station that students should start on the homework.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Rotational_Model-300x197.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-102 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/files\/2018\/02\/Rotational_Model-300x197-300x197.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"197\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Listen<\/strong> &#8211; a traditional chalk-and-talk lesson at the board, provided by me. The students sat in close proximity to me, on stools. I figured, even if they do nothing at the other stations, at least I get about 13 good minutes with each student right in front of me, where they can&#8217;t goof off.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Read<\/strong> &#8211; reading about the organ system from the text book, and my OneNote page summarizing that system.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Watch<\/strong> &#8211; watch a video about the organ system on Youtube (Crash Course!)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Play<\/strong> &#8211; links to various matching games, simulations, and quizlets, plus access to our human body model with removable organs.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>During initial feedback, some students suggested that the time for each station was too short. So I put Watch and Play together, giving them an opportunity to do either or both, and extending the rotations up to 15-18 minutes. It seemed like the vast majority of students rated &#8220;Listen&#8221; as their favourite station, which is bizarre since so few of them were actually listening during my previous lessons. I have just decided to get concrete data on this, rather than rely on anecdotal evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Students complained about the usual things, I suppose (mostly not being allowed to choose their group members). Overall, I&#8217;m not sure that I accomplished much, but I am glad that I tried it. I will take a class survey this week and see if they would want to do this again. It required a little bit of prep work to find the links, but otherwise wasn&#8217;t too hard or time-consuming. Be sure to comment if you have any suggestions!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How Might We Improve Student Engagement in High School Science Classes? Here&#8217;s the motivation for my action plan: most of my students are very social. They are also (for the most part) lower achievers than students I&#8217;ve taught in the past. So, I have many students who are more interested in talking than listening, and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/2018\/02\/03\/will-station-based-learning-increase-engagement-in-science-class\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Will &#8220;Station-Based Learning&#8221; increase engagement in science class?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":153,"featured_media":102,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wds_primary_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-action-plan","category-classroom-reflections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/153"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":111,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101\/revisions\/111"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cohort21.com\/jasonbornstein\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}