<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\nThese questions need to answered by a few people\/groups: firstly, the community; what insights can your community provide you that may be in your blind spots? For example, perceived cost to quality, lived experience of students as it pertains to your value proposition, and most importantly, what is your value proposition understood by the community?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSecondly, the administration of the school; what can they tell you about the faculty culture, the internal structures and systems of the school that are working, that are challenging and acting as roadblocks.<\/span><\/p>\nOther groups and people to consider are specific slices of your community by grade, by programming, etc\u2026 What might you learn with more nuance about a the experience of the entry grades of your schools? Why they chose your school, and what lived up to their expectations and what didn\u2019t?<\/span><\/p>\nWhile the consultative process is important, it cannot override the role of the Head in leading the strategy of the school.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe Role of the Head<\/b><\/p>\n
Olverson\u2019 s message is clear to anyone reading this book: the Head is responsible for the design and delivery of strategic planning and ultimately the success of the school. A political strategy of listening to everyone and trying to answer their concerns and wishes is not going to accomplish a meaningful strategy. (Pg. 27). Likewise, any successful Head of School will have to recognize their formal and informal \u2018power\u2019, and how to use, delegate, give away, and apply it to achieve the outcomes.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201c \u2026 I wanted to control the narrative and set the strategic priorities. And I was willing to take the heat. What I did not want was a watered-down political document\u201d (pg. 26)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\nTo understand the school, a new(ish) Head of School should conduct an in-depth analysis called a SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis. This should be done by the Head of School, to develop their own perspective of the school, and form a basis for more inquiry and for formulating impressions. It is also a key process to identify fidelity within the school between the mission and vision and the lived experience of the community. (Pg. 32) Olverson adds: \u201cI have seen the value of being the \u201cexpert\u201d\u201d (Pg. 33) He goes into a great story about how to be an expert, too long to repeat here, but is an example of\u00a0 great analogies that reinforce his perspectives.<\/span><\/p>\nTwo other key points about being an expert is a Head\u2019s relationship with consultants:\u00a0 \u201cA consultant can help by providing guidance on how to take the journey, but she should not hand the head a distilled set of findings and vision. The Head should never outsource the chance for deep learning.\u201d (Pg. 20)<\/span><\/p>\nAnd as a Head, it is vital to nurture, develop and seek to understand your own emotional intelligence. This is critical when it comes to leading the school through change.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nLeading Faculty through Change:<\/b><\/p>\n
Without hiring, nurturing and growing a talented faculty, \u201cA school leader can have the greatest ideas imaginable\u2026 but those ideas will only remain dreams.\u201d (Pg. 43)\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nTo be an effective leader, you have to be able to connect with the key resource that will make a strategic plan optimized. A talented faculty are the key drivers of putting a vision into reality, and – most significantly – understanding how that delivery is going, how effective is it, and what needs to be adjusted once begun. This can only be done through effective relationships between the Head and the faculty. Something that Olverson stresses throughout the book:<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe Head\u2019s capacity to \u2018read the audience\u2019, seek advice, and choose a strategy that will allow the faculty to see the [vision and challlenges that come with it] without getting defensive –\u00a0 all of these actions can be crucial to success. Effective Heads of School must have a high EQ\u2026\u201d pg. 21)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\nAnother key element to leading through change having an unwavering commitment to talent. Attracting and retaining, growing and sustaining talent within a school should be a top priority. It is this group that a Head will rely upon. (Pg. 53) And it is this group that will be the smartest person in the room. Accessing and attending to the talents of the team is dependent upon a Head\u2019s ability to create the conditions to encourage this talent to shine and be key contributors. (Pg. 53)<\/span><\/p>\nOne approach that Olverson advocates is to have clear and transparent expectations for teachers. If we want to tout the special qualities of our faculty as a key value at a our school, we must provide a system and path for meaningful professional growth and accountability. This is what it means to invest in our faculty. What does being a top-teacher mean by way of disposition to relationship building, content-knowledge, and pedagogical skills?<\/span><\/p>\nFor Olverson, at Rivers\u2019, it meant looking for candidates that had the desire to learn from mistakes, and a fierce determination to figure out the pathway to success. These were the attributes needed to achieve the strategy he was laying out for Rivers\u2019 at the time. What might be the attributes of your schools\u2019 faculty?<\/span><\/p>\n
\n