Due to many competing demands in our work space, Melody and I have struggled to move our project forward. Having said that, some thinking that has shifted is towards a more generalized framework showing progression, which would guide more grade level work. We don’t want what we are proposing to become a “make work” project, rather a tool to guide our planning and program development.
We also realized that we actually had already a number of pieces to help in the creation of this framework – a fairly decent starting point for our work.
What we really need, to be able to move our project forward, is collaborative time to dig into fleshing out the framework. And, following that, time for feedback from both our faculty and the literacy consultant we are working with. We would also LOVE to see if any frameworks or examples which are already in place in other schools that we could view and consider. We are also curious about how AI might help us develop something specific to our needs. We would need support in this area as we are just learning how best to use prompts to grow AI supports. Further, consideration of how to capture writing instruction which lives alongside all reading and many subjects instruction, will be next steps for us.
In an ideal world, our next face to face session will allow us time for collaborative work to develop our thinking, our possible framework for feedback.
@djojic
It’s great to see how you and Melody are refining your approach to literacy progression within a PYP transdisciplinary context. The shift towards a more generalized framework that supports grade-level planning is a smart move—it keeps the work manageable, relevant, and actionable rather than becoming an overwhelming documentation exercise. Your realization that you already have many pieces in place is a nice insight!
Below are some strategies, resources, and next steps that might help you move forward efficiently, even with time constraints.
1️⃣ Streamlining Your Framework: Moving from “Pieces” to a Clear Structure
Since you’ve already identified existing materials, the next step is structuring them into a cohesive progression. Here’s a possible framework to consider:
✅ Whole-School Literacy Vision (Generalized Framework)
• Defines key skills and competencies across JK-6.
• Aligns with the PYP transdisciplinary approach and Ontario Curriculum.
• Acts as a “big picture” guide for literacy development.
✅ Grade-Specific Literacy Maps
• Teachers collaboratively build out details relevant to their grade level.
• Identifies core literacy strategies, assessments, and key progress indicators.
• Helps ensure consistent and coherent literacy instruction across grades.
Reflection Question:
Would it be helpful to create a simple visual structure (e.g., a Google Doc or slide deck) where teachers can see the overall progression at a glance and then dig deeper into grade-specific expectations?
📌 Resource:
The PYP’s approach to transdisciplinary literacy (https://www.ibo.org/programmes/primary-years-programme/)
2️⃣ Finding Existing Literacy Frameworks: Learning from Other Schools
Since you mentioned wanting to see examples of literacy frameworks from other schools, here are some potential places to look:
🔍 International PYP Schools:
• International School of Geneva has a strong PYP literacy progression framework.
• Their focus on concept-based literacy instruction aligns well with what you’re aiming to do.
• Website: https://www.ecolint.ch/
🔍 Science of Reading Literacy Progressions:
• Schools implementing structured literacy (aligned with the Right to Read report) have well-mapped progressions.
• Example from The Reading League Canada: https://www.thereadingleague.org/
• Free phonemic awareness and structured literacy progressions: https://www.readingrockets.org/
🔍 CAIS Schools Literacy Scope & Sequence:
• Many CAIS schools are working on refining their structured literacy practices.
• Reaching out to literacy leads in CAIS schools could give insight into best practices.
📌 Action Step:
Would it be useful to connect with other PYP and CAIS schools to benchmark their literacy progression models and adapt what fits best for your context?
3️⃣ Leveraging AI to Build and Refine Your Framework
You mentioned being curious about how AI might help with literacy progression. Here’s how you could use AI tools to accelerate your work:
🤖 Using AI for Literacy Mapping
• AI can synthesize curriculum documents and identify gaps in your progression.
• You can feed AI the Ontario Language Curriculum, PYP guidelines, and Science of Reading research, and ask it to generate a scope and sequence draft.
• AI can help reorganize and refine based on specific skill areas (e.g., phonemic awareness, comprehension, fluency).
💡 Example AI Prompt:
“Analyze the Ontario Curriculum, PYP Language Scope & Sequence, and the Science of Reading framework to generate a literacy progression for Grades JK-6. Break it into major skill areas (phonemic awareness, decoding, fluency, comprehension, writing). Highlight grade-specific benchmarks and how they connect across levels.”
📌 Resource:
AI in Education – Practical ways to use AI for curriculum development (https://aiedu.org/)
📌 Next Step:
Would it help to try an AI-generated draft and edit collaboratively with your team rather than starting from scratch?
4️⃣ Capturing Writing Instruction in Your Literacy Framework
Your question about how writing fits into literacy instruction is an important one. Writing is often taught alongside reading but needs explicit structuring within a literacy progression.
📝 Ways to Integrate Writing in Your Literacy Framework:
• Parallel Skill Development: Ensure writing is mapped alongside reading at each grade level.
• Writing Genres & Text Types: Document the types of writing expected at each stage (e.g., narrative, expository, opinion writing).
• Writing Continuum: Track writing skills progression (sentence-level, paragraph development, organization, style).
📌 Resource:
The Institute for Excellence in Writing provides structured writing progressions – https://iew.com/
📌 Reflection Question:
Would it help to dedicate a section in your literacy progression framework specifically to writing, showing how it evolves alongside reading?
Diane, it’s inspiring to see how you and Melody are navigating this work with a strategic, thoughtful approach. Your commitment to ensuring this remains a useful tool rather than a “make work” project will be key to its success.
The challenge now is moving from vision to first prototype. Would it help to create a low-fidelity version first (perhaps just mapping out major skill areas at each grade) and iterating with teacher feedback before adding more detail?
Looking forward to seeing you at the 3rd face-to-face session at Montcrest School, where we can refine and iterate further!
Best,
Justin
Hi Dianne,
You may recall that several years ago, when we were working on shifting to digital portfolios, I used my time at Cohort 21 to make plan a series of explorations that allowed us to put a plan in place for the following school year. You can determine your own timeline. It’s great that you and Melody have this time together to plan your next steps!
Hi @djojic – great work! Justin has provided some incredible resources. I see you mentioned that one of things you really need is collaborative time. I hope you get some at our upcoming face-to-face session, but sometimes it never feels like enough, right? I sometimes have found that even when I can carve out time to meet with someone collaboratively weeks in advance, it can be something that gets pushed or moved because of what is more pressing. So I found that treating those planned sessions as important as my classes was helpful for me in the past (even if not always possible). And, always reassessing that good ol’ Eisenhower Matrix for what is truly important vs. just urgent is always something that helps ground me. Excited to chat more in person super-soon about next steps!